From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] blk-lib: fix error reporting
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 07:04:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1404828246.1967.8.camel@jarvis.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1407080859370.27276@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 09:05 -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > > + if (unlikely(err))
> > > + ACCESS_ONCE(bb->error) = err;
> >
> > I can't see a reason for the ACCESS_ONCE here.
>
> Multiple bios can be completed concurrently, so they write bb->error at
> the same time. The compiler may do store tearing (see "store tearing" in
> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt) - it may split one 4-byte write into
> several smaller writes - and it could result in setting bb->error to
> invalid value. We need ACCESS_ONCE to make sure that store tearing doesn't
> happen.
That's not correct, because it's not applicable in this case. Tearing
may occur on misalignment (which ACCESS_ONCE() cannot rectify because
it's architectural), short constant loads (again, usually architectural)
and structure copies, none of which applies here.
We can rely on a properly aligned 32 bit write being atomic.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-08 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-03 19:16 [PATCH] blk-lib: fix error reporting Mikulas Patocka
2014-07-08 9:50 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-08 13:05 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-07-08 14:04 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2014-07-16 10:22 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-07-16 10:22 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1404828246.1967.8.camel@jarvis.lan \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.