Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] Add cbs parameter support and removed sedf parameters with a LIBXL_API_VERSION gate from libxl.

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1377 bytes --]

On gio, 2014-07-10 at 15:09 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 16:55 -0400, Josh Whitehead wrote:
> > From: Robbie VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com>
> > 
> > We made an attempt at doing the versioning gate in this file.  Please let us
> > know if further changes are needed, and where they are needed to properly guard
> > the API.
> 
> I previously said that I thought it was fine to remove the obsolete SEDF
> stuff from the libxl API.
> 
> However I mentioned this to the other maintainers and they disagreed
> with me. The feeling is that an old application which used the old SEDF
> parameters should continue to build but that trying to use those
> parameters should result in an error.
>
Indeed. So, as far as this series is concerned, it looks like either the
following solutions:
 - introduce a new scheduler, with a new name, and deprecate SEDF all 
   together
 - keep the name and the full existing interface, but warn the user when
   she touches one of the params that are no longer in use in the 
   implementation
would be ok.

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel