diff for duplicates of <1405363248.25580.12.camel@deneb.redhat.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index c672e71..7e4d5ed 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ CPUs is marked as reserved memory in the TEXT_OFFSET area and the kernel placement using your patch makes it unreachable by kernel. Here is a patch I've been working with to solve the same problem: -From: Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> +From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:25:30 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] arm64/efi: try to handle firmware located below kernel @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ pitfalls remaining which may lead to boot failure: removed in the future, but would involve changes to generic stub code shared by other architectures. -Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> +Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> --- arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ index 453b7f8..2bc6469 100644 > -> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> +> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> > --- > This is a proposed bug fix for arm64 platforms that fail to boot through EFI > due to the fact that some bits of EFI itself are occupying the low end of DRAM. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 3f1a78e..32ef34a 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,15 +1,8 @@ "ref\01405351521-12010-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org\0" - "ref\01405351521-12010-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] efi/arm64: efistub: don't abort if base of DRAM is occupied\0" + "From\0msalter@redhat.com (Mark Salter)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH] efi/arm64: efistub: don't abort if base of DRAM is occupied\0" "Date\0Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:40:48 -0400\0" - "To\0Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" - linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org - leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org - roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org - " catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 17:25 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:\n" @@ -23,7 +16,7 @@ "placement using your patch makes it unreachable by kernel. Here is a\n" "patch I've been working with to solve the same problem:\n" "\n" - "From: Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>\n" "Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:25:30 -0400\n" "Subject: [PATCH] arm64/efi: try to handle firmware located below kernel\n" "\n" @@ -56,7 +49,7 @@ " removed in the future, but would involve changes to generic\n" " stub code shared by other architectures.\n" "\n" - "Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>\n" "---\n" " arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------\n" " arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---\n" @@ -176,7 +169,7 @@ "\n" "\n" "> \n" - "> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>\n" "> ---\n" "> This is a proposed bug fix for arm64 platforms that fail to boot through EFI\n" "> due to the fact that some bits of EFI itself are occupying the low end of DRAM. \n" @@ -221,4 +214,4 @@ "> \n" > -79f33781db59c170c34cf694dc34badc553a25c4eaf2d7ffee249a4dd94e7a87 +06c66e79b8240596ac75cc625be325f8f9ecf6a8f13498d0c82642b7167a5b43
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.