Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] powerpc/corenet: Add MDIO bus muxing support to the board device tree(s)

[Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>]

On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 00:48 -0500, Emil Medve wrote:
> Hello Scott,
> 
> 
> On 07/31/2014 12:28 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 23:35 -0500, Emil Medve wrote:
> >> Hello Scott,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/30/2014 09:30 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 16:52 -0500, Emil Medve wrote:
> >>>>>>>> +			mdio0: mdio <at> fc000 {
> >>>>>>>> +			};
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why is the empty node needed?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For the label
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For mdio-parent-bus, or is there some other dts layer that makes this
> >>>>> node non-empty?
> >>>>
> >>>> 'powerpc/corenet: Create the dts components for the DPAA FMan' -
> >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/370872
> >>>
> >>> Why does this patch define the mdio0 label for mdio@e1120, but not
> >>> define a label for any other node?
> >>
> >> Only MDIO controllers that are pinned out have these labels. Only pinned
> >> out MDIO(s) are capable of controlling external PHY(s) via these board
> >> level MDIO buses
> > 
> > Is there any reason to describe non-pinned-out MDIO controllers at all?
> 
> Yes. For the internal TBI PHY(s). Each MAC supporting SGMII has a TBI
> PHY that is attached to the MDIO controller of the respective MAC

OK, so similar to eTSEC.  I didn't know if you were counting aTBI
connection as being (partially) pinned out.

> > Is the lack of pinning out inherent to the silicon, or is it board
> > design/config?
> 
> It's a silicon level decision

So why is it the board file that adds the label, if it's always going to
be the same node?

> > I'm just curious why mdio@e1120 is labelled in a non-board dtsi while
> > others are labelled elsewhere.
> 
> Labels are relevant only in the context of 'powerpc/corenet: Add MDIO
> bus muxing support to the board device tree(s)' -
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/370866. Most labels are created and
> used in the board .dts file except b4qds.dtsi which is shared between
> b4420qds.dts and b4860qds.dts

I'm talking about qoriq-fman-0-1g-0.dtsi, not b4qds.dtsi.  It labels
mdio@e1120 as mdio0.

In other words, why is the decision on where to label made differently
for fman v3 than for previous fman versions?

-Scott