All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, <pjt@google.com>, <oleg@redhat.com>,
	<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
	<tkhai@yandex.ru>, <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	<mingo@kernel.org>, <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/6] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance()
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:07:04 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407312424.8424.48.camel@tkhai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140806075138.24858.23816.stgit@tkhai>


Keep on_rq = ONRQ_MIGRATING, while task is migrating, instead.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index cfeafb1..ed276e6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4706,7 +4706,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
 		return;
 
 	/*
-	 * This is possible from callers such as move_task(), in which we
+	 * This is possible from callers such as attach_tasks(), in which we
 	 * unconditionally check_prempt_curr() after an enqueue (which may have
 	 * lead to a throttle).  This both saves work and prevents false
 	 * next-buddy nomination below.
@@ -5114,18 +5114,20 @@ struct lb_env {
 	unsigned int		loop_max;
 
 	enum fbq_type		fbq_type;
+	struct list_head	tasks;
 };
 
 /*
- * move_task - move a task from one runqueue to another runqueue.
- * Both runqueues must be locked.
+ * detach_task - detach the task for the migration specified in env
  */
-static void move_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
+static void detach_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
 {
+	lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock);
+
 	deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, 0);
+	list_add(&p->se.group_node, &env->tasks);
+	p->on_rq = ONRQ_MIGRATING;
 	set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu);
-	activate_task(env->dst_rq, p, 0);
-	check_preempt_curr(env->dst_rq, p, 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -5363,9 +5365,9 @@ static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env)
 
 		/*
 		 * Right now, this is only the second place where
-		 * lb_gained[env->idle] is updated (other is move_tasks)
+		 * lb_gained[env->idle] is updated (other is detach_tasks)
 		 * so we can safely collect stats here rather than
-		 * inside move_tasks().
+		 * inside detach_tasks().
 		 */
 		schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle]);
 		return p;
@@ -5376,18 +5378,18 @@ static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env)
 static const unsigned int sched_nr_migrate_break = 32;
 
 /*
- * move_tasks tries to move up to imbalance weighted load from busiest to
- * this_rq, as part of a balancing operation within domain "sd".
- * Returns 1 if successful and 0 otherwise.
- *
- * Called with both runqueues locked.
+ * detach_tasks tries to detach up to imbalance weighted load from busiest_rq,
+ * as part of a balancing operation within domain "sd".
+ * Returns number of detached tasks if successful and 0 otherwise.
  */
-static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
+static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
 {
 	struct list_head *tasks = &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks;
 	struct task_struct *p;
 	unsigned long load;
-	int pulled = 0;
+	int detached = 0;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock);
 
 	if (env->imbalance <= 0)
 		return 0;
@@ -5418,14 +5420,15 @@ static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
 		if ((load / 2) > env->imbalance)
 			goto next;
 
-		move_task(p, env);
-		pulled++;
+		detach_task(p, env);
+
+		detached++;
 		env->imbalance -= load;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 		/*
 		 * NEWIDLE balancing is a source of latency, so preemptible
-		 * kernels will stop after the first task is pulled to minimize
+		 * kernels will stop after the first task is detached to minimize
 		 * the critical section.
 		 */
 		if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
@@ -5445,13 +5448,31 @@ static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Right now, this is one of only two places move_task() is called,
-	 * so we can safely collect move_task() stats here rather than
-	 * inside move_task().
+	 * Right now, this is one of only two places we collect this stat
+	 * so we can safely collect detach_one_task() stats here rather
+	 * than inside detach_one_task().
 	 */
-	schedstat_add(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle], pulled);
+	schedstat_add(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle], detached);
 
-	return pulled;
+	return detached;
+}
+
+/* Attach tasks previously detached in detach_tasks() */
+static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
+{
+	struct list_head *tasks = &env->tasks;
+	struct task_struct *p;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&env->dst_rq->lock);
+
+	while (!list_empty(tasks)) {
+		p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
+		BUG_ON(task_rq(p) != env->dst_rq);
+		list_del_init(&p->se.group_node);
+		p->on_rq = ONRQ_QUEUED;
+		activate_task(env->dst_rq, p, 0);
+		check_preempt_curr(env->dst_rq, p, 0);
+	}
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -6561,6 +6582,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 		.loop_break	= sched_nr_migrate_break,
 		.cpus		= cpus,
 		.fbq_type	= all,
+		.tasks		= LIST_HEAD_INIT(env.tasks),
 	};
 
 	/*
@@ -6610,16 +6632,35 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 		env.loop_max  = min(sysctl_sched_nr_migrate, busiest->nr_running);
 
 more_balance:
-		local_irq_save(flags);
-		double_rq_lock(env.dst_rq, busiest);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&busiest->lock, flags);
 
 		/*
 		 * cur_ld_moved - load moved in current iteration
 		 * ld_moved     - cumulative load moved across iterations
 		 */
-		cur_ld_moved = move_tasks(&env);
-		ld_moved += cur_ld_moved;
-		double_rq_unlock(env.dst_rq, busiest);
+		cur_ld_moved = detach_tasks(&env);
+
+		/*
+		 * We've detached some tasks from busiest_rq. Every
+		 * task is masked "ONRQ_MIGRATED", so we can safely
+		 * unlock busiest->lock, and we are able to be sure
+		 * that nobody can manipulate the tasks in parallel.
+		 * See task_rq_lock() family for the details.
+		 */
+
+		raw_spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
+
+		if (cur_ld_moved) {
+			raw_spin_lock(&env.dst_rq->lock);
+			/*
+			 * Attach the tasks to env->dst_rq
+			 * and mask them "ONRQ_QUEUED".
+			 */
+			attach_tasks(&env);
+			raw_spin_unlock(&env.dst_rq->lock);
+			ld_moved += cur_ld_moved;
+		}
+
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 		/*
@@ -6755,7 +6796,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 		 * If we've begun active balancing, start to back off. This
 		 * case may not be covered by the all_pinned logic if there
 		 * is only 1 task on the busy runqueue (because we don't call
-		 * move_tasks).
+		 * detach_tasks).
 		 */
 		if (sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval)
 			sd->balance_interval *= 2;




  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-06  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20140806075138.24858.23816.stgit@tkhai>
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] sched/fair: Fix reschedule which is generated on throttled cfs_rq Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20  8:20   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-23 23:27   ` [PATCH v4 1/6] " Wanpeng Li
2014-10-24  6:01     ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-24  9:32       ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-24 15:12         ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] sched: Wrapper for checking task_struct::on_rq Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20  7:52   ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] sched: Teach scheduler to understand ONRQ_MIGRATING state Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-12  7:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12  8:34     ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-12  9:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] sched: Remove double_rq_lock() from __migrate_task() Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-12  8:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from active_load_balance_cpu_stop() Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-12  9:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12  9:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12  9:39     ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-06  8:07 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2014-08-12  9:36   ` [PATCH v4 6/6] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance() Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12 10:27     ` Kirill Tkhai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1407312424.8424.48.camel@tkhai \
    --to=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.