All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: sec-irq: fix support for devices without irq specified
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 09:48:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407484136.21474.8.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407483274.21474.1.camel@AMDC1943>

On pią, 2014-08-08 at 09:34 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On czw, 2014-08-07 at 18:48 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > [ added missing linux-samsung-soc ML, sorry for the noise ]
> > 
> > On Thursday, August 07, 2014 06:42:28 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > Add missing check for the case of device without irq specified
> > > in sec_irq_exit() (please note that sec_irq_init() already
> > > correctly handles such devices).
> > > 
> > > This is needed for Insignal's Exynos4412 based Origen board.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> > > Cc: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> > > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > > patch is against next-20140804 branch of linux-next kernel
> > > 
> > >  drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 3 ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> Looks and works good (tested on board with S2MPS14).
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
> > > index f9a5786..b65a7f0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
> > > @@ -478,5 +478,6 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
> > >  
> > >  void sec_irq_exit(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
> > >  {
> > > -	regmap_del_irq_chip(sec_pmic->irq, sec_pmic->irq_data);
> > > +	if (sec_pmic->irq)
> > > +		regmap_del_irq_chip(sec_pmic->irq, sec_pmic->irq_data);
> > >  }

Seems I jumped too far with this one. Patch looks OK and works fine but
is it really needed? If (!sec_pmic->irq) then sec_pmic->irq_data will be
NULL and regmap_del_irq_chip() will handle it correctly.

Your change adds some sense of precautions (the sec_pmic->irq_data may
be set by some other module by mistake) but still it does not look like
"needed" for Origen.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-08  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-07 16:42 [PATCH] mfd: sec-irq: fix support for devices without irq specified Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-08-07 16:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-08-08  7:34   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-08-08  7:48     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2014-08-08 12:44       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1407484136.21474.8.camel@AMDC1943 \
    --to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sbkim73@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.