From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:25:40 +0800 Message-ID: <1408350340.2533.3.camel@perseus.fritz.box> References: <20140818062844.9860.43007.stgit@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=themaw.net; h= message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=zTa30W+V8/AG+UDK5XGB/8loYDE=; b=hcXpyqwifg1WbLNesa8ky+vZNdmX +fcF7geou0S5+DpKzcnaa/c9+LsF8V5VN1YNphPA6+UiOmXyz4Mma63G1Kpub4w6 6QjV8h8qQMIrkh25lnt4K40P5WM0JMzov0Fhp8QJ6wpK5yqvfjnZx6SV0wd5lDHW Pa82cQ9iL9ZMWxg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date :in-reply-to:references:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=zTa30W+V8/AG+UDK5XGB/8 loYDE=; b=THeZ2LlFwqwt76T5qygd6MjCbzjKKcnazTi80DiMn+DkAjOuKrC2CS quIOdPEW1QIlqAFGSE48hWMS+o7PsgGAcuhcDz9WfXt/EbCrKbRNDodw9INZWlem gSRHi5Duk+dXOp9aXbH2IIk71aSa7N10Xc0Arxa7WjyppnUi6lX44= In-Reply-To: <20140818062844.9860.43007.stgit@notabene.brown> Sender: autofs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: NeilBrown Cc: autofs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:33 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > Hi Ian, > Have you had a chance to run your tests in these patches yet? > I've done what testing I can think of and cannot fault them. I haven't, I've been plagued with illness so I'm not getting nearly enough done. I'll try to put a kernel together and run the test in the next week or so. > > This set is against 3.17-rc1 and make use of the new -EISDIR handling > for d_manage() and assumes the other patches which already went in > through Andrew Morton. > > I've added a section to autofs4.txt about mount namespaces, but it is > otherwise unchanged. > > If I could get an {Acked,Reviewed,Tested}-By in the next few weeks so > I can send them on to Andrew I would really appreciate it. > > Thanks, > NeilBrown > > > > --- > > NeilBrown (5): > autofs4: allow RCU-walk to walk through autofs4. > autofs4: factor should_expire() out of autofs4_expire_indirect. > autofs4: avoid taking fs_lock during rcu-walk > autofs4: d_manage() should return -EISDIR when appropriate in rcu-walk mode. > autofs: the documentation I wanted to read > > > Documentation/filesystems/autofs4.txt | 520 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h | 6 > fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c | 2 > fs/autofs4/expire.c | 200 ++++++++----- > fs/autofs4/root.c | 62 +++- > 5 files changed, 694 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/filesystems/autofs4.txt >