From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, zatimend@hotmail.co.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: add and use memzero_explicit() for clearing data
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:11:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409008290.6274.73.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408996899-4892-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com>
On Mo, 2014-08-25 at 22:01 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> zatimend has reported that in his environment (3.16/gcc4.8.3/corei7)
> memset() calls which clear out sensitive data in extract_{buf,entropy,
> entropy_user}() in random driver are being optimized away by gcc.
>
> Add a helper memzero_explicit() (similarly as explicit_bzero() variants)
> that can be used in such cases where a variable with sensitive data is
> being cleared out in the end. Other use cases might also be in crypto
> code. [ I have put this into lib/string.c though, as it's always built-in
> and doesn't need any dependencies then. ]
>
> Fixes kernel bugzilla: 82041
>
> Reported-by: zatimend@hotmail.co.uk
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
In case this pattern of important function calls getting optimized away
emerges more often we could also go with a wrapper which forces the
execution of the function, like:
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -181,6 +181,13 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
#define OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(var) barrier()
#endif
+#ifndef OPTIMIZER_FORCE_CALL
+#define OPTIMIZER_FORCE_CALL(func, args...) ({ \
+ typeof(func) * volatile __func = (func); \
+ __func(args); \
+ })
+#endif
+
/* Not-quite-unique ID. */
#ifndef __UNIQUE_ID
# define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __LINE__)
Thanks,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-25 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-25 20:01 [PATCH] random: add and use memzero_explicit() for clearing data Daniel Borkmann
2014-08-25 20:35 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2014-08-25 20:38 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-08-25 23:11 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2014-08-27 3:21 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-12-01 10:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-12-01 11:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-01 11:29 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-12-01 11:38 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-12-01 13:39 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-01 11:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409008290.6274.73.camel@localhost \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zatimend@hotmail.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.