From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <1409099608.21254.16.camel@smoke> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kexec: minor fixups and enhancements From: Geoff Levand Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:33:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140825165916.GC14379@redhat.com> References: <20140825165916.GC14379@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biederman , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Hi Vivek, On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 12:59 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Does arm64 has secureboot? If yes, then it might make sense to > enable the new syscall kexec_file_load() on arm64 instead of trying > to make old syscall work first. Yes, arm64 should support secureboot, but I have not looked into it. When do you expect syscall kexec_file_load to get merged? I won't wait until then to push my current kexec work. -Geoff _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:1868:205::9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E8731A003C for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:34:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1409099608.21254.16.camel@smoke> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kexec: minor fixups and enhancements From: Geoff Levand To: Vivek Goyal Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:33:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140825165916.GC14379@redhat.com> References: <20140825165916.GC14379@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biederman , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Vivek, On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 12:59 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Does arm64 has secureboot? If yes, then it might make sense to > enable the new syscall kexec_file_load() on arm64 instead of trying > to make old syscall work first. Yes, arm64 should support secureboot, but I have not looked into it. When do you expect syscall kexec_file_load to get merged? I won't wait until then to push my current kexec work. -Geoff From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756356AbaH0AeJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:34:09 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:53678 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755437AbaH0AeH (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:34:07 -0400 Message-ID: <1409099608.21254.16.camel@smoke> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kexec: minor fixups and enhancements From: Geoff Levand To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Eric Biederman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Andrew Morton , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:33:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140825165916.GC14379@redhat.com> References: <20140825165916.GC14379@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vivek, On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 12:59 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Does arm64 has secureboot? If yes, then it might make sense to > enable the new syscall kexec_file_load() on arm64 instead of trying > to make old syscall work first. Yes, arm64 should support secureboot, but I have not looked into it. When do you expect syscall kexec_file_load to get merged? I won't wait until then to push my current kexec work. -Geoff