Re: [PATCH v2] xen/arm: check on domain type against hardware support

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>]

On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 12:13 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:28 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> Hi Ian,
> >>
> >> On 09/29/2014 01:23 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 11:28 +0530, vijay.kilari@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> Some arm64 platforms implement only aarch64 mode. So allow
> >> >> domains that are only 64-bit
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> >> >
> >> > I think this is a bug fix so we should take it for 4.5.
> >>
> >> I made a quick comment in response to your answer on V1.
> >
> > Vijay, based on Julien's comments on v1 I'm inclined to
> > s/cpu_has_a32/cpu_has_arm/, so we refer to arm+thumb not a32+thumb which
> > combines to different naming schemes. An alternative would be
> > s/cpu_has_thumb/cpu_has_t32/ but I don't like that much.
> >
> > Does that work for you? I can make the trivial change so no need to
> > resend (unless you want to).
> 
> Sorry for late reply, I was on vacation.
> I am ok with this change.

Thanks, I've committed this change.