From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Martin Walch <walch.martin@web.de>
Cc: yann.morin.1998@free.fr, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kconfig: fix bad syntactic transformation in expr.c
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:10:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412669443.18874.16.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411405999-20212-2-git-send-email-walch.martin@web.de>
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 19:13 +0200, Martin Walch wrote:
> expr_eliminate_dups2() in scripts/kconfig/expr.c applies two bad
> inference rules:
>
> (FOO || BAR) && (!FOO && !BAR) -> n
> (FOO && BAR) || (!FOO || !BAR) -> y
>
> They would be correct in propositional logic, but this is a three-valued
> logic, and here it is wrong in that it changes semantics. It becomes
> immediately visible when substituting FOO and BAR with m.
Well, not to me. When I apply the rules under "Menu dependencies" in
Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt, in embarrassingly small
steps, I get:
(m || m) && (!m && !m) ->
(1 || 1) && ((2 - 1) && (2 - 1)) ->
(1 || 1) && (1 && 1) ->
max(1, 1) && min(1, 1) ->
1 && 1 ->
min(1, 1) ->
1 -> m
and
(m && m) || (!m || !m) ->
(1 && 1) || ((2 - 1) || (2 - 1)) ->
(1 && 1) || (1 || 1) ->
min(1, 1) || max(1, 1) ->
1 || 1 ->
max(1, 1) ->
1 -> m
Did I do that right? Anyway, perhaps you'd like to add a line or two how
these two expressions actually evaluate when FOO and BAR are m.
> Fix it by removing expr_eliminate_dups2() and the functions that have no use
> anywhere else: expr_extract_eq_and(), expr_extract_eq_or(),
> and expr_extract_eq() from scripts/kconfig/expr.[ch]
>
> Currently the bug is not triggered in mainline, so this patch does not modify
> the configuration space there.
>
> As a side effect, this reduces code size in expr.c by roughly 10% and slightly
> improves startup time for all configuration frontends.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Walch <walch.martin@web.de>
Does Yann still care about Kconfig? Yann has been rather quiet for a
while now.
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-07 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-10 14:31 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/2] kconfig: Remove bad inference rules expr_eliminate_dups2() Martin Walch
2014-09-22 17:13 ` [Resending PATCH v2 0/2] kconfig: fix bad syntactic transformation Martin Walch
2014-09-22 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kconfig: fix bad syntactic transformation in expr.c Martin Walch
2014-10-07 8:10 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-10-07 9:21 ` Dirk Gouders
2014-10-11 0:20 ` Martin Walch
2014-10-11 19:07 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-22 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kconfig: trivial - adjust comments Martin Walch
2014-10-10 13:01 ` Paul Bolle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412669443.18874.16.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=walch.martin@web.de \
--cc=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.