From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v22] tools: CMDs and APIs for Cache Monitoring Technology Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:37:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1412930244.10650.18.camel@citrix.com> References: <1412827324-15859-1-git-send-email-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> <1412827324-15859-2-git-send-email-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> <20141009090908.GA17263@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20141010062937.GA20633@pengc-linux.bj.intel.com> <1412929599.10650.10.camel@citrix.com> <5437B579020000780003D8C9@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5437B579020000780003D8C9@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Wei Liu , stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Chao Peng , dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov, keir@xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 09:31 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 10.10.14 at 10:26, wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 14:29 +0800, Chao Peng wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:09:08AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:02:04PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote: > >> > > Introduced some new xl commands to enable/disable Cache Monitoring > >> > > Technology(CMT) feature. > >> > > > >> > > The following two commands is to attach/detach the CMT feature > >> > > to/from a certain domain. > >> > > > >> > > $ xl psr-cmt-attach domid > >> > > $ xl psr-cmt-detach domid > >> > > > >> > > This command is to display the CMT information, such as L3 cache > >> > > occupancy. > >> > > > >> > > $ xl psr-cmt-show cache_occupancy > >> > > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu > >> > > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng > >> > > >> > Acked-by: Wei Liu > >> > > >> > In your later contribution please don't forget to carry over any tags > >> > you got during review. > >> > > >> > Wei. > >> > >> So konrad, is it the time to allow this patch in? > > > > Has Konrad not already acked this series? Given that the hypervisor side > > went in earlier in the week I was going to assume so (i.e. I even tried > > to apply v21) and just go ahead. > > Iirc he explicitly excluded this patch from his ack, since he wants > maintainer acks to be in place before giving his. Ah, ok. I'll wait then Ian.