From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: run intel_uncore_early_sanitize earlier on resume
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:25:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412940336.4638.11.camel@intelbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412876816-2313-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:46 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> As far as I understand, intel_uncore_early_sanitize() was supposed to
> be ran before any register access, but currently
> intel_resume_prepare() is ran earlier, and it does register
> access. I don't think it should be safe to be calling
> I915_{READ,WRITE} without calling intel_uncore_early_sanitize() first.
>
> One of the problems we currently have is that when we suspend/resume
> BDW, the FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM bit becomes 1, so we end up printing an
> "unclaimed register" message on resume, but this message doesn't
> really seem to have been triggered by our driver or user space, since
> the bit was not there before suspending, and gets there just after
> resuming, before any of our own register accesses. So calling
> intel_uncore_early_sanitize() as a first thing will allow us to stop
> printing the error message, fixing the "bug".
One issue is that intel_uncore_early_sanitize() uses forcewake, which is
enabled only in prepare resume for VLV (vlv_allow_gt_wake()). Maybe
FPGA_DBG could be reset separately before the rest?
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83094
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Maybe we need to move even more code up?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index a05a1d0..dffb173 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -665,11 +665,11 @@ static int i915_drm_thaw_early(struct drm_device *dev)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> int ret;
>
> + intel_uncore_early_sanitize(dev, true);
> ret = intel_resume_prepare(dev_priv, false);
> if (ret)
> DRM_ERROR("Resume prepare failed: %d,Continuing resume\n", ret);
>
> - intel_uncore_early_sanitize(dev, true);
> intel_uncore_sanitize(dev);
> intel_power_domains_init_hw(dev_priv);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-10 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-09 17:46 [PATCH] drm/i915: run intel_uncore_early_sanitize earlier on resume Paulo Zanoni
2014-10-10 11:25 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2014-10-15 19:07 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-10-16 16:04 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412940336.4638.11.camel@intelbox \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.