From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm32: fix build after 063188f4b3 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:35:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1412958948.9178.4.camel@eu.citrix.com> References: <54380211020000780003DC42@mail.emea.novell.com> <5437E94E.9010202@linaro.org> <54380E91020000780003DD61@mail.emea.novell.com> <5438018D.1000308@linaro.org> <1412956867.27111.56.camel@eu.citrix.com> <543805E2.7080408@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XcdIg-0006pL-4c for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:44:18 +0000 In-Reply-To: <543805E2.7080408@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: Suriyan Ramasami , Tim Deegan , Stefano Stabellini , Jan Beulich , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 17:14 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > The freeze period doesn't mean we need to do something that we know > won't work on different compiler. Conversely we shouldn't block a fix for a known regression because it doesn't work with clang, which AFAIK can't currently build Xen anyway. Nor should we put the burden of supporting clang on Jan. Ian.