From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FF1713DA for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 07:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s9B755nv010445; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:05:05 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LLacF-OiBvCh; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:05:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s9B74xNA010442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:05:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1413011133.7562.5.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Saul Wold Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:05:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <54381C20.2060602@linux.intel.com> References: <54380BF4.6010205@urbanec.net> <54381C20.2060602@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for gcc bug 61144 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 07:05:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:49 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 10/10/2014 09:40 AM, Peter Urbanec wrote: > > See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61144 for details. > > > > This patch is taken from the gcc repository and should be obsoleted by a > > gcc release after 4.9.1 > > > > The problem is severe enough (at least from my point of view) to need > > this patch until the next gcc release is available. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Peter > > Thank you for the patches. > > Both the patch and the 0056-top-level-reorder_gcc-bug-61144.patch patch > file need to have Signed-off-by tags and the gcc patch itself needs an > Upstream-Status: Backport tag so we know it was a backport. > > Please review the > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines > > I also note the second patch you sent does not have a Signed-off-by in > the commit message or the .patch files (which also needs an > Upstream-Status tag). > > Can you please send a V2 updates commit for both of these. Just to be clear, because of the important nature of the gcc fix and our looming release deadlines, Saul has sent out a version of it in this case. We don't normally do that. Cheers, Richard