From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] dmaengine: pl330: Remove non-NULL check for pl330_submit_req parameters
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1413290650.13192.3.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141014115118.GG1638@intel.com>
On wto, 2014-10-14 at 17:21 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 02:42:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The pl330_submit_req() checked supplied 'struct pl330_thread thrd' and
> > 'struct dma_pl330_desc desc' parameters for non-NULL. However these
> > checks are useless because supplied arguments won't be NULL.
> even if we have some error or bug?
>
> I would like this to be checked and complained loudly so we know something
> is going wrong rather than assuming it will be correct always.
Currently the driver would fail before or after, regardless of this
check. However I do not insist on this approach.
The first version of patch was little different:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/5/390
Do you think that 1st version is worth resending?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-14 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-29 12:42 [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] dmaengine: pl330: Remove non-NULL check for pl330_submit_req parameters Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-09-29 12:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/4] dmaengine: pl330: Remove unused 'regs' variable in pl330_submit_req() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-10-14 12:02 ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-29 12:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/4] dmaengine: pl330: Fix NULL pointer dereference on probe failure Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-10-14 12:03 ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-29 12:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 4/4] dmaengine: pl330: Fix NULL pointer dereference on driver unbind Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-10-14 12:03 ` Vinod Koul
2014-10-14 11:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] dmaengine: pl330: Remove non-NULL check for pl330_submit_req parameters Vinod Koul
2014-10-14 12:40 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-10-15 7:57 ` Vinod Koul
2014-10-14 12:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1413290650.13192.3.camel@AMDC1943 \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.