From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Xen 4.5 development update (October update). RC1 on 24th Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:27:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1413887245.23337.18.camel@citrix.com> References: <20141017171401.1C26FF1C99@laptop.dumpdata.com> <1413797649.12595.15.camel@citrix.com> <20141020213522.GC11707@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XgWf4-00079w-0G for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:27:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20141020213522.GC11707@laptop.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thomas Leonard , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 17:35 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:34:09AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > (trimming CC) > > > > > > == Completed == > > > > > > > * ARM - MiniOS (done) > > > > v7 posted > > > > - Thomas Leonard > > > > > > This is not done (not all patches were applied). I posted v8 on 3 Oct > > > (no responses yet): > > > > > > http://secure-web.cisco.com/1NORYat5BVWAwMsjfvGF0k7Ee_T_ZzL9YKSpewPbI66HTgK77xdmAxMSLBVz6C9fC3H-OEKUDOL5x6euVAPQaeofcWA93024oyK541ILoyr6qYO1JMrU-Qo83IhJCIlt-4J5OBuN6bM2QFmnKBFxe4G_32qO79Vis0SJN0XD0hJA/http%3A%2F%2Flists.xenproject.org%2Farchives%2Fhtml%2Fxen-devel%2F2014-10%2Fmsg00395.html > > > > Oh, somehow I missed this (I had it in my mind you were on vac I think). > > > > WRT the freeze my thinking is that this isn't yet tied into the toplevel > > build so baring any interactions with either the common or x86 specific > > mini-os code there would be no downside to committing this even fairly > > late in the release cycle. I think whatever happens it would be > > considered at best "experimental" for 4.5. > > > > Thomas, could you repost it please with 'for-xen-4.5' on the patch > series. I was planning to just review the existing posting with that in mind, unless Thomas has any pending changes do we need a resend? Ian.