From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [OPW PATCH V4] tools: xl: refactor code to parse network device options Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:02:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1414141335.15687.15.camel@citrix.com> References: <1413927381-21549-1-git-send-email-alecsandra.sandulescu@gmail.com> <1413977758.19198.12.camel@citrix.com> <20141022202146.GB6020@laptop.dumpdata.com> <1414050974.20604.79.camel@citrix.com> <3C254340-3D3F-4744-81FA-D9E65450D9A4@oracle.com> <1414099258.20604.84.camel@citrix.com> <1414137663.3584.5.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XhalS-0006wF-60 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:02:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Alexandra Sandulescu Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 11:58 +0300, Alexandra Sandulescu wrote: Please don't top post on the xen-devel list. > I have tested stuff by hand (I took the code and created some > structures - a bit of workaround let's say). What do you mean here? Have you run the xl command on a real Xen system with these patch applied? > Should I test it with OSSTest too? If you've tested manually on a real Xen system I don't think this is necessary, although if you are interested in getting osstest going then I am quite happy to offer guidance where necessary. > What I understood from Wei is that he tested my patch. Maybe I got it > wrong. That's not how I understood his comment, but I'll let him clarify. Ian.