From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] cpuidle driver for QCOM SoCs: 8064, 8074, 8084 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:15:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1414401339.2343.2.camel@mm-sol.com> References: <1414194024-55547-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ns.mm-sol.com ([37.157.136.199]:53672 "EHLO extserv.mm-sol.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751761AbaJ0JPZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 05:15:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1414194024-55547-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Lina Iyer Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, khilman@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, galak@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, msivasub@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Lina, On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 17:40 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote: > Changes since v8: > [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg11473.html ] > - Flatten out the file structure - merge pm.c into spm.c after discussions > - Add a new function to set warm boot address, in scm-boot.c > - Support for 8064 (New) > - Tested on 8074, 8084. 8064 was tested with a WIP tree > - Address review comments from v8 > - Looking into possiblility of initializing the cpuidle device for a cpu, > only when the corresponding spm device is probed successfully. > > And this is based on...? Please, could you be explicit what kind of patches are needed before applying this patch set. Is seems that they don't depend just on "Lorenzo's ARM idle-states patches", I see patches from Stephen Boyd, Olav Haugan and Vikram Mulukutla in your tree. Regards, Ivan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: iivanov@mm-sol.com (Ivan T. Ivanov) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:15:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v9 0/9] cpuidle driver for QCOM SoCs: 8064, 8074, 8084 In-Reply-To: <1414194024-55547-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> References: <1414194024-55547-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> Message-ID: <1414401339.2343.2.camel@mm-sol.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Lina, On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 17:40 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote: > Changes since v8: > [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org/msg11473.html ] > - Flatten out the file structure - merge pm.c into spm.c after discussions > - Add a new function to set warm boot address, in scm-boot.c > - Support for 8064 (New) > - Tested on 8074, 8084. 8064 was tested with a WIP tree > - Address review comments from v8 > - Looking into possiblility of initializing the cpuidle device for a cpu, > only when the corresponding spm device is probed successfully. > > And this is based on...? Please, could you be explicit what kind of patches are needed before applying this patch set. Is seems that they don't depend just on "Lorenzo's ARM idle-states patches", I see patches from Stephen Boyd, Olav Haugan and Vikram Mulukutla in your tree. Regards, Ivan