From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: Intel: Make ADSP memory block
 allocation more generic
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:09:54 +0000
Message-ID: <1414404594.6917.7.camel@loki>
References: <1413814012-5619-1-git-send-email-liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
 <20141021230224.GF2344@sirena.org.uk> <5449FE1B.9000201@linux.intel.com>
 <5449FF2A.9070200@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E87260859
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:10:17 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <5449FF2A.9070200@linux.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 10:26 +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 10/24/2014 10:22 AM, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > Hi Liam
> >
> > On 10/22/2014 02:02 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:06:46PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> >>> Current block allocation is tied to block type and requestor type. 
> >>> Make the
> >>> allocation more generic by removing the struct module parameter and 
> >>> adding
> >>> a generic block allocator structure. Also pass in the list that the 
> >>> blocks
> >>> have to be added too in order to remove dependence on block 
> >>> requestor type.
> >> I'm having trouble apply this - patch 1 manages to apply with some fuzz
> >> but patch 5 is failing.  Probably needs refreshing against Vinod's
> >> recent changes?  I applied everything up to patch 4 (ASoC: Intel: Add
> >> runtime module support).
> >
> > For me sound.git for-next head a929d726a507 don't build anymore. I 
> > have to revert all your four recent patches cd51c82524ff -4. I guess 
> > some patch order or dependency issue since the first patch doesn't 
> > build when applied to topic/intel?
> >
> Ah, nevermind. Mark was dropped these already. I was building at my 
> local copy of for-next branch before patches were dropped.
> 

Yeah, it looks like it was out of sync with Vinod's latest patches so
I'll resend today now that I'm back from holidays.

Liam