From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:40599 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751646AbaKDNBA (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:01:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1415106058.11912.9.camel@umadbro> (sfid-20141104_140123_010490_B454B338) Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: Move join/leave_ocb comments to be in the correct order From: Rostislav Lisovy To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com, Rostislav Lisovy Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:00:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1415105716.2064.17.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1415105352-4295-1-git-send-email-rostislav.lisovy@fel.cvut.cz> (sfid-20141104_134918_159065_C641379A) <1415105716.2064.17.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 13:55 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 13:49 +0100, Rostislav Lisovy wrote: > > Use the same ordering in the comments section as it > > is in the structure below. > > Well, I think I confused you :-) > The report from Fengguang's build bot was actually when there was no > documentation, and then I added it and I guess you thought that it was > sending out the report because it was in the wrong place? > > Anyway, I think I'll just leave it as is, and not apply this, ok? Yes, that is what I thought. The second confusion was that most of the other comments were not in the same order as their fields. Ok, no need to apply this. Rostislav