From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:32:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.14]:64402 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27006150AbaKJMc4JEEV6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:32:56 +0100 Received: from cpsps-ews26.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.192]) by cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:32:49 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF101.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.4]) by cpsps-ews26.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:32:49 +0100 Received: from [192.168.10.108] ([77.173.140.92]) by CPSMTPM-TLF101.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:32:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1415622769.21229.15.camel@x220> Subject: Re: MIPS: ralink: CONFIG_RALINK_ILL_ACC? From: Paul Bolle To: John Crispin Cc: Valentin Rothberg , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:32:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <544E188B.9000707@openwrt.org> References: <1414403681.28499.4.camel@x220> <544E188B.9000707@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2014 12:32:49.0369 (UTC) FILETIME=[70493C90:01CFFCE2] X-RcptDomain: linux-mips.org Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 43951 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: pebolle@tiscali.nl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Hi John, This message never made it to my Inbox. I copied it from a mips' list archive om the web. That kept this issue on my TODO list, although it actually was resolved quite quickly. On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 11:03 +0100, John Crispin wrote: > On 27/10/2014 10:54, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Your commit 78865eacb4aa ("MIPS: ralink: add illegal access > > driver") landed in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141027). That > > commit dates back to May 16, 2013! It adds a driver that is built > > if CONFIG_RALINK_ILL_ACC is set. But there's no Kconfig symbol > > RALINK_ILL_ACC. > > > > I assume that patch that adds this symbol is queued somewhere. Is > > that correct? > > i'll look into it. the commit that move all dts files to a central > folder broke some of my patches so i had to rebase them. apparently > the bit that adds the symbol got lost. (CONFIG_RALINK_ILL_ACC was already gone in next-20141029. So that issue is resolved, as far as I care.) > out of interest, how did you spot this ? See https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/26/456: I have a 800 line perl monster that checks for stuff like this. It's not very sophisticated but smart enough to spot typos like this one. I try to have it check each linux-next (and mainline) release. (I think Valentin Rothberg is trying to automate this properly. See http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2014/ocw/sessions/1863 .) This is the last time I'll put pressure on Valentin _publicly_, I promise! Paul Bolle