From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.5 4/4] xen: arm: Support the other 4 PCI buses on Xgene Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:56:20 +0000 Message-ID: <1416390980.29243.12.camel@citrix.com> References: <1416329045.17982.27.camel@citrix.com> <1416329088-23328-4-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <546B7E9E.9040806@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <546B7E9E.9040806@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: Clark Laughlin , Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar , tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:15 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > + default: > > + /* Ignore unknown PCI busses */ > > I would add a > printk("Ignoring PCI busses %s\n", dt_node_full_name(dev)); > > > + ret = 0; > > + break; > > continue? Yes, that makes sense (probably the ret = is then unnecessary). > You can't assume the order of the PCI busses in the device tree. But, I don't understand what this has to do with using continue. > > > + } > > + > > + if ( ret < 0 ) > > + return ret; > > + > > + printk("Mapped additional regions for PCIe device at 0x%"PRIx64"\n", > > + addr); > > Printing the device tree path would be more helpful than the address. OK.