From: Lukasz Pawelczyk <l.pawelczyk@samsung.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Lukasz Pawelczyk <havner@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>,
Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/exit.c: make sure current's nsproxy != NULL while checking caps
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:01:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417086070.1805.9.camel@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1411261326170.32216@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On śro, 2014-11-26 at 13:32 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Lukasz Pawelczyk wrote:
> >
> > LSM task_kill() hook is triggered and current->nsproxy within is NULL.
> >
> > This happens during an exit() syscall because exit_task_namespaces() is
> > called before the exit_notify(). This patch changes their order.
> >
>
> This is a classic case of a patch being proposed for a problem that only
> occurs on kernels that include other patches that are not upstream. The
> order that things are deconstructed in the exit path is complex and
> carefully choreographed, changing it comes at significant risk. That risk
> would be justified if a patch were being proposed for upstream that fixes
> an upstream problem. It becomes too much of a maintenance nightmare to
> try to address problems and keep issues from arising for non-upstream
> patches. Thus, I don't think this is something that we want.
This is a problem for the change I'm working on and I will be
upstreaming it too at some point. Please see my other reply for more
details:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1877152.html
The only thing I can do then is to post this patch together with the
other patches when the time comes. But since this issue is rather
separate I've decided to try to push it earlier.
--
Lukasz Pawelczyk
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-27 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 14:21 [PATCH] kernel/exit.c: make sure current's nsproxy != NULL while checking caps Lukasz Pawelczyk
2014-11-26 20:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-27 10:55 ` Lukasz Pawelczyk
2014-11-26 21:32 ` David Rientjes
2014-11-27 11:01 ` Lukasz Pawelczyk [this message]
2014-12-01 21:08 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1417086070.1805.9.camel@samsung.com \
--to=l.pawelczyk@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guillaume@morinfr.org \
--cc=havner@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=snanda@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.