From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.5] flask/policy: Example policy
 updates for migration
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:07:11 +0000
Message-ID: <1418137631.19809.5.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1417798987-10325-1-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
	<1418032087.11028.5.camel@citrix.com>
	<20141208155205.GC7745@laptop.dumpdata.com>
	<1418054046.2827.18.camel@citrix.com>
	<20141208160730.GH7745@laptop.dumpdata.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141208160730.GH7745@laptop.dumpdata.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>, wei.liu2@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 11:07 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:54:06PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 10:52 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:48:07AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 12:03 -0500, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> > > > > The example XSM policy was missing permission for dom0_t to migrate
> > > > > domains; add these permissions.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reported-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Konrad, we should take this for 4.5, in order to have a working example
> > > > XSM policy. There's 0 risk to non-XSM systems, or systems with custom
> > > 
> > > Thought this looks like it never worked in the past then? As in, this
> > > is not a regression but a bug that had existed for quite a while?
> > 
> > AIUI it has worked in the past, i.e. I remember applying other series
> > from Daniel to fix it for previous releases. This patch is the policy
> > catching up with the developments during 4.5.
> 
> OK then definilty RElease-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> 

Applied.