From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [netdev01] registration inconsistency Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:19:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1418390391.2470.45.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1418326801.15709.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <5489F9B2.60306@mojatatu.com> <1418375818.2470.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> <548AD48A.9080009@mojatatu.com> (sfid-20141212_124211_758846_FC6380B5) <1418387022.2470.26.camel@sipsolutions.net> <548AE9AF.90902@mojatatu.com> (sfid-20141212_141219_330667_DC5C359F) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev01@lists.netfilter.org, Brenda Butler , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Richard Guy Briggs To: Jamal Hadi Salim Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:33357 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967764AbaLLNT5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:19:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <548AE9AF.90902@mojatatu.com> (sfid-20141212_141219_330667_DC5C359F) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 08:12 -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > > Looking back at this, I think you meant that the *talks* were going to > > be 50/50 like that, but some people have contacted me about that they > > thought *attendance* was going to be like that. In fact I just glossed > > over it and until now thought the same! > > > > If I'm right that you meant *talks* then I think you should clarify that > > language and even send out a clarification as a reply to the CFP email. > > > > I think i got it. > Either a reply or we fix the CFP on the website. > Ccing Richard. I think a reply message would be good so it lands with those people who might have gotten the original and misinterpreted it as well. Your call :) johannes