All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sivaji <rameshmrm@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Regarding MPC8641D
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:45:31 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14184234.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1196874416.32356.3.camel@kaboom.lisle.iphase.com>


Hai,
             The kernel was compiled in SMP mode. The low memory offset mode
is only for AMP mode means, then how we test both the core 0 and 1 in the
linux kernel ?. Asper my understanding if we enable the Low Memory Offset
mode, then only the core1 translation is enabled. If we disalbed the Low
Memory offset mode, Only Core 0  will work in SMP mode and Core 1 will idle.
If we want to test the efficient of Dual core means we need to enable both
the core and Low Memory Offset Mode. For this configuration linux kernel was
not up.
( Please correct me if I am wrong )

Thanks and Regards
Sivaji


Chris Fester wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 23:51 -0800, sivaji wrote:
>>             We have designed  a MPC8641D based AMC card. We are using the
>> kernel (2.6.23-rc4) and uboot (1.2.0).  When we disable the core1 Low
>> Memory
>> offset mode the kernel was up and when we enable this core1 Low Memory
>> offset mode kernel was not up, It was hang after MPIC initialization.
> [snip!]
>>                      After this the kernel was hang, i want to know why
>> kernel was hang when we enalbe Low memory Offset mode. Please help me to
>> fix
>> this issue.
> 
> Have you compiled your kernel for SMP mode?  I believe the Low memory
> offset mode is only for AMP mode (vxworks can use this, probably other
> OSes).  I don't know if the kernel has support for any multiprocessing
> mode other than SMP.
> 
> Hope that helps,
> Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Regarding-MPC8641D-tf4948004.html#a14184234
Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-06  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-05  7:51 Regarding MPC8641D sivaji
2007-12-05 17:06 ` Christopher Fester
2007-12-06  0:45   ` sivaji [this message]
     [not found] <mailman.9.1196902804.16874.linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
2007-12-06  1:05 ` Siva Prasad
2007-12-06  1:45   ` sivaji
2007-12-06  1:14 ` Siva Prasad
     [not found] <mailman.414.1196916416.10024.linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
2007-12-06 17:54 ` Siva Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14184234.post@talk.nabble.com \
    --to=rameshmrm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.