From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix segfault in xl migrate --debug Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:18:40 +0000 Message-ID: <1418897920.11882.12.camel@citrix.com> References: <547643C8.5000806@citrix.com> <1417176581.23604.25.camel@citrix.com> <20141201211117.GF22021@laptop.dumpdata.com> <20141216215546.GA19797@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20141216225546.GA20393@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141216225546.GA20393@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: Andrew Cooper , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, M A Young List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 22:55 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:04:25PM +0000, M A Young wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > >On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 08:38:42PM +0000, M A Young wrote: > > >[...] > > >>Is this patch going to get committed in time for xen 4.5? > > >> > > > > > >Yes. See d36a3734a6. > > > > > >And there's a subsequence patch to fix a regression caused by that > > >patch. See 09b7ff1a. > > > > > >Wei. > > > > No that is the other bug in xl migrate --debug (it fails rather than > > segfaults). > > > > Ah, I misread. Sorry. I think I'd confused the two as well. I've now applied the thing from . I had to jump through several hoops, first because of the attachment containing the patch but the body containing the S-o-b and second because the patch used DOS line endings. Please could you investigate the use of git format-patch and/or git send-email for future patch submissions (see http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Submitting_Xen_Patches for some hints on driving those tools). Ian.