From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: Issues with commit 34b48db6 ("block: remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap") Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:54:20 -0800 Message-ID: <1419958460.2164.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:39619 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751749AbaL3QyV (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:54:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Stern Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Kenneth R. Crudup" , SCSI development list , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, USB list , USB Storage list On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 11:45 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > PS: What's the current situation of my "SCSI: fix regression in > scsi_send_eh_cmnd()" patch: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=141658469207765&w=2 > > submitted on November 21? Since it was a bug-fix, I rather expected it > to get merged before 3.18 was released. Since it didn't, I certainly > hope it will get in before 3.19. Looks like it just got overlooked. Since Hannes has reviewed it, I'll add it to the fixes branch. James