From: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] lpfc: correct device removal deadlock after link bounce
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:08:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1419959338.1683.1.camel@myfc17> (raw)
This patch, applicable to 8G/4G/2G adapters, adds a call that
resumes transmit operations after a link bounce. Without it, targets
that tried to suspend exchanges after a link bounce (such as tape devices
using sequence level error recovery) would never resume io operation,
causing scan failures, and eventually deadlocks if a device removal
request is made.
The patches were cut against Christoph's scsi-queue.git,
branch "drivers-for-3.18". The driver rev cut against is 10.4.8000.0
-- james s
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@emulex.com>
---
lpfc_els.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c 2014-12-29 12:48:08.000000000 -0500
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c 2014-12-30 11:23:04.344426606 -0500
@@ -2225,6 +2225,15 @@ lpfc_adisc_done(struct lpfc_vport *vport
if ((phba->sli3_options & LPFC_SLI3_NPIV_ENABLED) &&
!(vport->fc_flag & FC_RSCN_MODE) &&
(phba->sli_rev < LPFC_SLI_REV4)) {
+ /* The ADISCs are complete. Doesn't matter if they
+ * succeeded or failed because the ADISC completion
+ * routine guarantees to call the state machine and
+ * the RPI is either unregistered (failed ADISC response)
+ * or the RPI is still valid and the node is marked
+ * mapped for a target. The exchanges should be in the
+ * correct state. This code is specific to SLI3.
+ */
+ lpfc_issue_clear_la(phba, vport);
lpfc_issue_reg_vpi(phba, vport);
return;
}
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-30 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-30 17:08 James Smart [this message]
2014-12-30 17:15 ` [PATCH] lpfc: correct device removal deadlock after link bounce Laurence Oberman
2015-01-02 16:22 ` Ewan Milne
2015-01-05 19:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1419959338.1683.1.camel@myfc17 \
--to=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.