From: Ian P <ian@underpressuredivers.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RAID mapper device size wrong after replacing drives
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:24:59 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14200241.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
Hi,
I have a problem with my RAID array under Linux after upgrading to larger
drives. I have a machine with Windows and Linux dual-boot which had a pair
of 160GB drives in a RAID-1 mirror with 3 partitions: partiton 1 = Windows
boot partition (FAT32), partiton 2 = Linux /boot (ext3), partiton 3 =
Windows system (NTFS). The Linux /root is on a separate physical drive. The
dual boot is via Grub installed on the /boot partiton, and this was all
working fine.
But I just upgraded the drives in the RAID pair, replacing them with 500GB
drives. I did this by replacing one of the 160s with a new 500 and letting
the RAID copy the drive, splitting the drives out of the RAID array and
increasing the size of the last partition of the 500 (which I did under
Windows since its the Windows partiton) then replacing the last 160 with the
other 500 and having the RAID controller create a new array with the two
500s, copying the drive that I'd copied from the 160. This worked great for
Windows, and that now boots and sees a 500GB RAID drive with all the data
intact.
However, Linux has a problem and will not now boot all the way. It reports
that the RAID /dev/mapper volume failed - the partition is beyond the
boundaries of the disk. Running fdisk shows that it is seeing the larger
partiton, but still sees the size of the RAID /dev/mapper drive as 160GB.
Here is the fdisk output for one of the physical drives and for the RAID
mapper drive:
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1 625 5018624 b W95 FAT32
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda2 626 637 96390 83 Linux
/dev/sda3 * 638 60802 483264512 7 HPFS/NTFS
Disk /dev/mapper/isw_bcifcijdi_Raid-0: 163.9 GB, 163925983232 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19929 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks
Id System
/dev/mapper/isw_bcifcijdi_Raid-0p1 1 625 5018624
b W95 FAT32
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/mapper/isw_bcifcijdi_Raid-0p2 626 637 96390
83 Linux
/dev/mapper/isw_bcifcijdi_Raid-0p3 * 638 60802 483264512
7 HPFS/NTFS
They differ only in the drive capacity and number of cylinders.
I started to try to run a Linux reinstall, but it reports that the partiion
table on the mapper drive is invalid, giving an option to re-initialize it
but saying that doing so will lose all the data on the drive.
So questions:
1. Where is the drive size information for the RAID mapper drive kept, and
is there some way to patch it?
2. Is there some way to re-initialize the RAID mapper drive without
destroying the data on the drive?
Thanks,
Ian
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RAID-mapper-device-size-wrong-after-replacing-drives-tf4958354.html#a14200241
Sent from the linux-raid mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-06 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-06 20:24 Ian P [this message]
2007-12-07 6:40 ` RAID mapper device size wrong after replacing drives Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14200241.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=ian@underpressuredivers.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.