From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.5] reset PCI devices on force removal even when QEMU returns error Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:45:17 +0000 Message-ID: <1420544717.28863.155.camel@citrix.com> References: <1999787702.20141212161352@eikelenboom.it> <20141212165035.GA28592@laptop.dumpdata.com> <20141217210739.GC1829@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141217210739.GC1829@laptop.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Sander Eikelenboom , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson , "Wei Liu (Intern)" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 16:07 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:13:06AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:13:52PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > > > Hi Konrad, > > > > > > > > This doesn't seem to be applied yet, nor does it seem to have a release-(N)ACK > > > > from you ? > > > > > > Hm, Stefano: > > > > > > - Is this a regression? > > > > I don't think so. Probably a regression compared to the xend toolstack > > though. > > OK, so that is Xen 4.4 -> Xen 4.5 regression then. > > Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk An updated version with the logging which I had indicated I would prefer doesn't appear to be forthcoming so I've just applied this one.