From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] xen: mark grant mapped pages as
 foreign
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:47:20 +0000
Message-ID: <1420822040.21186.45.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1420570657-8203-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
	<1420570657-8203-7-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1501091601290.3058@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<1420820376.21186.39.camel@citrix.com> <54B0043A.1030805@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>) id 1Y9ckv-0002Vg-9T
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:49:49 +0000
In-Reply-To: <54B0043A.1030805@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jenny Herbert <jenny.herbert@citrix.com>, Jenny Herbert <jennifer.herbert@citrix.com>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 16:39 +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> > ... or stubbed out for arches which don't need this (which might include
> > arm*?).
> 
> I'm reasonably certain that this is required for HVM and ARM guests as
> well.  The grant copy will still fail to get the page by gfn since the
> mfn is owned by a different domain.

Yes, I'd somehow convinced myself this snippet was to do with the
m2p_override aspect of the series, which it's not.

Ian.