Re: Fwd: [OPW PATCH 1/4] tools/xl: Calling _init and _dispose function for libxl types

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>]

On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 18:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:

Just getting back to these after the freeze.

> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Uma Sharma <uma.sharma523@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Should I resend the patches then?
> 
> On the xen-devel list, always reply at the bottom, like this.  :-)
> 
> I think normally it wouldn't matter, but since the point of the
> exercise is to get you familiar with the tools, I'd say yes, why don't
> you send them again (maybe using the 'v2' tag).

Was there a v2 here? If so I seem to have misplaced it.

As it stands it looks like I have:
[OPW PATCH 2/4] tools/xl: Call init function for libxl_domain_sched_params
(AKA <544581bd.847e460a.4ff9.ffffab04@mx.google.com>)
[OPW PATCH 3/4] tools/xl: Call init function for libxl_bitmap
(AKA <54458271.a28b420a.52e5.ffffae47@mx.google.com>)

Both of which are acked by Wei, I have applied them.

I don't seem to have the actual 1/4 patch, or was 1/4 just the cover
letter?

[OPW PATCH 4/4] tools/xl:Call init and dispose function for libxl_dominfo
(AKA <544583e4.c8e7420a.6486.ffffb2da@mx.google.com>) was incorrect, as
was the followup "tools/xl:Making _dispose function simplicity for
libxl_dominfo". I think the code in that case is correct as is.

Please let me know if there are any other outstanding patches from the
OPW application process which I've missed.

Ian.