From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-4.4-testing test] 33394: regressions - FAIL
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:52:50 +0000
Message-ID: <1421229170.19103.181.camel@citrix.com>
References: <osstest-33394-mainreport@xen.org>
	<54B641080200007800054A5F@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>) id 1YBKdD-0001X7-K4
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:52:55 +0000
In-Reply-To: <54B641080200007800054A5F@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 09:12 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 13.01.15 at 21:30, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > flight 33394 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33394/ 
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1  5 xen-boot      fail REGR. vs. 33292
> 
> In all recent xen-boot failures I looked at the boot process seems
> stalled starting ntpd - is that perhaps infrastructure related?

That's not impossible, I'd suspect DNS related. Hopefully all this sort
of thing will be much better (or at least under our control) in the new
colo.

> >  test-amd64-i386-pair   17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 33292
> 
> Both involved hosts appear to still be affected by the swiotlb issue
> - wasn't that supposed to long be addressed?

The patches to increase the swiotlb size in osstest didn't help, I
think.

David V posted some patches upstream to fix the problem at the root, but
I don't remember seeing any responses from the upstream maintainers
(they touched some common and/or x86 code IIRC)

Ian.