From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:11:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421262663.4464.9.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411065089.2017.72.camel@x220>
David, Koichi,
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 20:31 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> 0) Raised before in
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-am33-list/2011-November/msg00007.html .
>
> 1) Discussed, at length, in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/9/164 .
>
> 2) Compile tested only (on top of next-20140918, using
> arch/mn10300/configs/asb2303_defconfig).
>
> 3) Logically this should be one humongous patch. It is split into five
> patches to ease review. Review, or actually any reaction whatsoever,
> would be appreciated.
>
> 4) The last patch was basically done by checking the output of
> git grep -i gdb.*stub arch/mn10300
>
> and make educated guesses.
>
> Paul Bolle (5):
> MN10300: Remove Kconfig symbol GDBSTUB
> MN10300: Remove Kconfig symbols depending on GDBSTUB
> MN10300: Remove all checks for CONFIG_GDBSTUB
> MN10300: Remove checks for GDBSTUB related Kconfig macros
> MN10300: Remove remnants of gdbstub
>
> arch/mn10300/Kconfig | 6 +-
> arch/mn10300/Kconfig.debug | 120 +-
> arch/mn10300/boot/compressed/misc.c | 9 -
> arch/mn10300/include/asm/exceptions.h | 7 -
> arch/mn10300/include/asm/gdb-stub.h | 182 ---
> arch/mn10300/kernel/Makefile | 3 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/entry.S | 21 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial-low.S | 91 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial.c | 174 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm-low.S | 93 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm.c | 303 ----
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-low.S | 115 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-stub.c | 1923 -----------------------
> arch/mn10300/kernel/head.S | 10 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.c | 28 +-
> arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.h | 15 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c | 14 +-
> arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c | 11 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/profile.c | 2 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/smp-low.S | 4 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/smp.c | 7 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/traps.c | 4 +-
> arch/mn10300/mm/fault.c | 9 -
> arch/mn10300/mm/misalignment.c | 1 -
> arch/mn10300/mm/tlb-mn10300.S | 14 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2303/include/unit/serial.h | 85 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2303/unit-init.c | 4 +-
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2305/include/unit/serial.h | 78 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2305/unit-init.c | 6 +-
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2364/include/unit/serial.h | 66 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2364/unit-init.c | 4 +-
> 31 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3393 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/include/asm/gdb-stub.h
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial-low.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm-low.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-low.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-stub.c
This series still applies on top of next-20150114. Neither of you ever
bothered to send even the briefest of message regarding this issue.
I'm inclined to think mn10300 is actually orphaned. Would a patch that
makes MAINTAINERS reflect that thought trigger any response?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-18 18:31 [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED Paul Bolle
2015-01-14 19:11 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421262663.4464.9.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.