From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: Update documentation in the public header arch-arm.h Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:48:59 +0000 Message-ID: <1421329739.5437.10.camel@citrix.com> References: <1421240029-9478-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YBknI-0003wq-JN for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:49:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1421240029-9478-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: Keir Fraser , Ian Jackson , tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 12:53 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Minor updates to the documentation in xen/include/public/arch-arm.h: > - Comments coding style fix > - Typoes > - Update the list of supported hypercalls by ARM > - Remove uncessary comment about 64bit. "unnecessary" > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Cc: Ian Jackson > Cc: Jan Beulich > Cc: Keir Fraser > > --- > I'm not sure if we usually backport documentation. If so, I'd like > to request backporting for Xen 4.5. I don't think we need to TBH, any development should be against unstable and we publish these headers online for ease of access. > + * All generic sub-operations > * > * HYPERVISOR_domctl > * All generic sub-operations, with the exception of: > - * * XEN_DOMCTL_iomem_permission (not yet implemented) > * * XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission (not yet implemented) > * > * HYPERVISOR_sched_op > @@ -183,7 +178,7 @@ > * XEN_GUEST_HANDLE represents a guest pointer, when passed as a field > * in a struct in memory. On ARM is always 8 bytes sizes and 8 bytes > * aligned. > - * XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM represent a guest pointer, when passed as an > + * XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM represents a guest pointer, when passed as an > * hypercall argument. It is 4 bytes on aarch and 8 bytes on aarch64. Is there a "32" missing in this last sentence do you think? (not the bit you touched) I can fix the "unnecessary" on commit, so: Acked-by: Ian Campbell Ian.