From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 722AB1A0D67 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:15:55 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: <1421377482.18166.5.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: Re: offlining cpus breakage From: Michael Ellerman To: Alexey Kardashevskiy In-Reply-To: <54B85B3C.1030000@ozlabs.ru> References: <54ACFE6D.3070308@ozlabs.ru> <54B7BEF9.8090603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <54B85B3C.1030000@ozlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:04:42 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Preeti U Murthy , "Shreyas B. Prabhu" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Anton Blanchard , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:28 +1300, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 01/16/2015 02:22 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote: > > Hi Alexey, > > > > Can you let me know if the following patch fixes the issue for you ? > > It did for us on one of our machines that we were investigating on. > > This fixes the issue for me as well, thanks! > > Tested-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy OK, that's great. But, I really don't think we can ask upstream to merge this patch to generic code when we don't have a good explanation for why it's necessary. At least I'm not going to ask anyone to do that :) So Pretti can you either write a 100% convincing explanation of why this patch is correct in the general case, or (preferably) do some more investigating to work out what Alexey's bug actually is. cheers