From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 638DEE008A7; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:18:03 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49CEE0084E for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:17:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t0LMHldX016792; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:17:47 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6OrUW_-W2P9v; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:17:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t0LMHVAH016782 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:17:42 GMT Message-ID: <1421878651.19798.6.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Denys Dmytriyenko Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:17:31 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20150121213150.GN20639@denix.org> References: <5100308.QAtzWr7jXK@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <2632438.D1xOHJKf9V@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <20150121192726.GJ20639@denix.org> <1421875415.19798.5.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <20150121213150.GN20639@denix.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Eggleton , yocto@yoctoproject.org, Otavio Salvador , Denys Dmytriyenko Subject: Re: Difference between target, cross, native and nativesdk. X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:18:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 16:31 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:23:35PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 14:27 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:23:38AM -0200, Raphael Philipe wrote: > > > > I was explained about the difference in a different way. > > > > > > > > cross generates binary for the host architecture. But the way this > > > > binary is generated depends of the target architecture. Native > > > > generated binaries that do not depend of the target architecture. > > > > > > Pretty much. > > > > > > But another big difference is that -native packages do not generate IPK, RPM > > > or DEB, while -nativesdk, -cross, -crosssdk and -cross-canadian do. > > > > -cross and -crosssdk do not generate packages. > > Yeah, I thought so initially, but then I found depmodwrapper-cross and > qemuwrapper-cross packages in my deploy/ipk, which got me confused... They > seem to be special cases and only have scripts and not binaries. I wonder if > the name is misleading... More like they shouldn't be getting packaged... Cheers, Richard