From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86: pmc_atom: save struct device pointer in pmc Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:29:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1421918985.31903.113.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1421790603-30097-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1421790603-30097-2-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <54C07190.3090403@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:59007 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750758AbbAVJ3s (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 04:29:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54C07190.3090403@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Li, Aubrey" Cc: x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J . Wysocki" , "Kumar P, Mahesh" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 11:42 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > On 2015/1/21 5:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The change allows to use dev_printk() type of macros in the module functions. > > The patch itself looks good to me, but not sure why do we need this > change, will we use dev_prink in the subsequent patches? Has no relations to the rest, indeed. Just found that would be easier to send them together. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy