From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fls() / ffs() adjustments Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:59:09 +0000 Message-ID: <1421938749.23842.30.camel@eu.citrix.com> References: <54C108910200007800058233@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJE5-0002p4-5o for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:59:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54C108910200007800058233@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Keir Fraser , Stefano Stabellini , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , Andrew Cooper , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 13:26 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > 1: make fls() and ffs() consistent across architectures > 2: arm64: fix fls() > > ARM maintainers: If you desire so, I'm fine with patch 2 being replaced > by anything you like better (e.g. as Ian C mentioned, compiler builtins), > just don't rely on me doing so. I'll do this as an incremental change once this is in, rather than blocking you. > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Both: Acked-by: Ian Campbell