diff for duplicates of <1421963049.30744.23.camel@neuling.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index bcfc8bf..a5cd902 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -2,10 +2,9 @@ > > > probed independently. > > > > Yep, that's the idea, although setting the running values won't change -> > anything since the the translation is already doomed and will abort onc= -e +> > anything since the the translation is already doomed and will abort once > > the cpu starts executing it. ->=20 +> > So this looks to me like the overall effect on debugging transactional > code should be the same on Power and z, even if some internal details > are different (on z, the exception will automatically abort the @@ -36,7 +35,7 @@ to change. "Current position" depends on your perspective. Is it the last executed instruction or the next executed instruction? If it's the last executed instruction, then it's the running values. If it's the next, then it's -the check pointed. =20 +the check pointed. Anyway, I'm happy to make it the check pointed values for the sake of ptrace/gdb. @@ -44,7 +43,7 @@ ptrace/gdb. > - a new ptrace register set should allow access (read-only) to the > *running* register values -This is because changing them won't ever result in a side effect? =20 +This is because changing them won't ever result in a side effect? > -- GDB can use this to display the position inside the transaction > at the point it aborted, using new transaction-specific commands diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index efc7afb..438bc72 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -9,35 +9,35 @@ "Subject\0Re: [V6,1/9] elf: Add new powerpc specifc core note sections\0" "Date\0Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:44:09 +1100\0" "To\0Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>\0" - "Cc\0shuahkh@osg.samsung.com" - james.hogan@imgtec.com + "Cc\0akpm@linux-foundation.org" avagin@openvz.org - Paul.Clothier@imgtec.com - peterz@infradead.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + davej@redhat.com davem@davemloft.net dhowells@redhat.com - linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org + Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com> + james.hogan@imgtec.com + Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> kirjanov@gmail.com - tglx@linutronix.de + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org + Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> oleg@redhat.com - sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com - davej@redhat.com - akpm@linux-foundation.org palves@redhat.com - Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com> + Paul.Clothier@imgtec.com + peterz@infradead.org sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com - " Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" + shuahkh@osg.samsung.com + sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com + " tglx@linutronix.de\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "> > > Inside transaction both running and check pointed values can be\n" "> > > probed independently.\n" "> >\n" "> > Yep, that's the idea, although setting the running values won't change\n" - "> > anything since the the translation is already doomed and will abort onc=\n" - "e\n" + "> > anything since the the translation is already doomed and will abort once\n" "> > the cpu starts executing it.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> So this looks to me like the overall effect on debugging transactional\n" "> code should be the same on Power and z, even if some internal details\n" "> are different (on z, the exception will automatically abort the\n" @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ "\"Current position\" depends on your perspective. Is it the last executed\n" "instruction or the next executed instruction? If it's the last executed\n" "instruction, then it's the running values. If it's the next, then it's\n" - "the check pointed. =20\n" + "the check pointed. \n" "\n" "Anyway, I'm happy to make it the check pointed values for the sake of\n" "ptrace/gdb.\n" @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ "> - a new ptrace register set should allow access (read-only) to the\n" "> *running* register values\n" "\n" - "This is because changing them won't ever result in a side effect? =20\n" + "This is because changing them won't ever result in a side effect? \n" "\n" "> -- GDB can use this to display the position inside the transaction\n" "> at the point it aborted, using new transaction-specific commands\n" @@ -87,4 +87,4 @@ "\n" PS in the subject s/specifc/specific/ -f0a451c4f1cf558385c90bdccad82da011badef985bb06f189fd470d69afa936 +40c68b7c700bbe7d7cd2f81933df4db7cdc4a07503075622a3c02b9c6ed0b3ef
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.