From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3FB718DD for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t0RGHVoL021411; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:17:31 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ltkTR60gkFSj; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:17:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t0RGH7xG021386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:17:30 GMT Message-ID: <1422375427.19798.55.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Bruce Ashfield Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:17:07 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54C7B296.5020506@windriver.com> References: <1422372551.19798.53.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <54C7B296.5020506@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Hart, Darren" , openembedded-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] image: Add missing depends on virtual/kernel for depmod data X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:17:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 10:45 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 15-01-27 10:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > We need the depmod data so that the kernel depmod command works successfully > > at rootfs time. The fact this was working inconsistently is now highlighted > > after the command was made to error out. A simple test case is: > > > > bitbake virtual/kernel image > > bitbake vrituak/kernel -c clean > > bitbake image -c rootfs -f > > > > We fix it by adding the missing dependency. > > Looks good here. > > Out of curiosity, was this hiding before, or did it only come about due > to our recent moves to the work-shared kernel builds ? It was hiding before, it just used to silently do things differently depending on whether certain files were present or not. Now we get a hard error. Cheers, Richard