From: Simo <simo@samba.org>
To: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: The patents and license issue from microsoft regarding SMB implementation(GPL)
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:07:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422454054.32747.35.camel@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000801d03aa1$92475b40$b6d611c0$@samsung.com>
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:24 +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am planning to develop smb server for Linux kernel.
> Before starting on implemntation, want to clear patent related issue
> to know if it is legal to develop or not.
I have no idea about legal implications, and you'll get no answers here
for sure. Ask a lawyer. We can probably suggest a lawyer to consult with
if your lawyer needs help.
That said, an in kernel smb server is not really a bright idea, I would
think hard before going there, Solaris tried, went nowhere quickly.
Even if you get the SMB part of the protocols in kernel, you'll need so
many userspace helpers it is not even funny.
Better time would be spent analyzing what features in the kernel would
make Samba faster and use Samba.
Simo.
> When referring to the SAMBA site
> (https://www.samba.org/samba/PFIF/PFIF_history.html), I can see that there are
> a lot of legal obligations from the past. Like SAMBA, I also am just
> referring the Microsoft SPEC, while the implementation is all together different
> due to obvious reasons (in-kernel implementation).
> As there is already an in kernel CIFS client, maybe CIFS developers had the same
> concern when developing CIFS client for Linux kernel ?
> But I'm not sure about the actual violation part.
> Maybe, I am wondering two problem.
> 1. When referring the Microsoft patent list, CIFS(SMB) and SMB2.0,
> Microsoft have raised patent applications but this overall seems to be
> about the implementation part. So, any implementation done on linux
> with SMB specifications in mind and not following the approach of Microsoft
> should not infringe any patents ?
> 2. While Samba have shifted to the GPLv3 with their newer version, but
> I intend to make GPLv2.0 SMB server in kernel.
> So implementation for this should not cause any license issues ?
>
> Can you please help us in clearing the doubts ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Simo Sorce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-28 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-28 2:24 The patents and license issue from microsoft regarding SMB implementation(GPL) Namjae Jeon
2015-01-28 14:07 ` Simo [this message]
2015-01-28 19:36 ` Aw: " support
2015-01-28 22:32 ` Jeremy Allison
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1422454054.32747.35.camel@samba.org \
--to=simo@samba.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.