From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: stubdom vtpm build failure in staging
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:46:32 +0000
Message-ID: <1422528392.30641.24.camel@citrix.com>
References: <20150128150850.GA4285@aepfle.de>
	<1422458693.5187.19.camel@citrix.com>
	<945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28890E87F6C4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<20150129082706.GB1410@aepfle.de>
	<945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28890E87F775@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<20150129093649.GA20318@aepfle.de> <20150129102736.GA1106@aepfle.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150129102736.GA1106@aepfle.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "Xu, Quan" <quan.xu@intel.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 11:27 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, Olaf Hering wrote:
> 
> > Looks like old gcc can not handle two typedefs?
> 
> Yes, this fails already:
> 
> typedef unsigned char BYTE;
> typedef unsigned char BYTE;
> void f(int *v) { *v *= *v; }
> 
> t.c:2:23: error: redefinition of typedef 'BYTE'
> t.c:1:23: note: previous declaration of 'BYTE' was here

This compiles for me on Debian with gcc 4.7.2-5.

I'm honestly not sure what the C standard says about duplicate but
identical typedefs -- Ian?

Ian.