From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH v4 3/9] ts-xen-build: build with XSM support if requested Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:51:58 +0000 Message-ID: <1422888718.19293.44.camel@citrix.com> References: <1418250095-13287-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <1418250095-13287-4-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <1422882874.19293.10.camel@citrix.com> <20150202143048.GA2743@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150202143048.GA2743@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 14:30 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:14:34PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 22:21 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu > > > > Inconsistent whitespace in the final hunk, but: > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell > > > > This will override the default XSM_ENABLE always, even if no runvar is > > present, I guess we think that is correct? > > > > I'm not sure what's correct. I originally treated it as the same as > debug=. But now since there is doubt about what is the correct behaviour > I will make it only set XSM_ENABLE when runvar is set in next version. That's probably going to have the least potential to be problematic in the future. Ian.