From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: [PATCH] spmi: pmic_arb: enable build on arm64 platforms Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:14:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1423062897.23022.19.camel@x220> References: <1422971459-20431-1-git-send-email-svarbanov@mm-sol.com> <1422996157.23894.35.camel@x220> <54D23527.2080509@mm-sol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54D23527.2080509@mm-sol.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stanimir Varbanov Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kumar Gala , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:05 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > On 02/03/2015 10:42 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig > >> index bf1295e..115348c 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig > >> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ if SPMI > >> > >> config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB > >> tristate "Qualcomm MSM SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)" > >> - depends on ARM > >> + depends on ARM || ARM64 > >> depends on IRQ_DOMAIN > >> depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST > >> default ARCH_QCOM > > > > But only if COMPILE_TEST is set too, isn't it? Is that intended? > > No, the driver will be used on arm64 qcom platforms, also. But ARCH_QCOM currently is (32 bit) arch/arm only, isn't it? Paul Bolle