From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-3.14 bisection] complete
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:28:28 +0000
Message-ID: <1423063708.24924.20.camel@citrix.com>
References: <E1YIKcS-0007ZZ-IG@osstest.cam.xci-test.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1502041518480.29696@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502041518480.29696@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "xen.org" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 15:19 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, xen.org wrote:
> > branch xen-unstable
> > xen branch xen-unstable
> > job test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3
> > test xen-boot
> > 
> > Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
> > Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
> > Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-unstable.git
> > Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
> > Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
> > 
> > *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
> 
> Actually stable/linux-3.14.y already contains the revert of
> 3394691d34fc9baaaff3637b858b9911cd2b327d, commit id
> 98047ad0dcb515a19dec0d9179ef3f7c0c0f3cee.
> 
> Is it possible that the bisector is confused?

It was bisecting over b91261aa8a..4d7313cd7cbe, which doesn't include
the above.

IOW I think this bisect started before 98047ad0dcb5 appears in 3.14.y.

Ian.