From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 34157: regressions - FAIL
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:00:53 +0000
Message-ID: <1423141253.24924.113.camel@citrix.com>
References: <osstest-34157-mainreport@xen.org>
	<54D375F3020000780005D4E7@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>) id 1YJM3W-0001LV-TV
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:01:15 +0000
In-Reply-To: <54D375F3020000780005D4E7@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 12:53 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.02.15 at 10:53, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > flight 34157 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34157/ 
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 11 rumpuserxen-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels fail REGR. vs. 34088
> 
> I have no clue what is going on here, ...

I saw something very similar in a recent flight on the osstest branch.
Ian -- YHM about that somewhere (list wasn't ccd though).

It looks to be some sort of Heisenbug in the rump kernel stuff.

> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  5 xen-boot             fail REGR. vs. 34088
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  5 xen-boot           fail REGR. vs. 34088
> 
> ... while these two again seem to suffer from the ntpd daemon
> startup issue queried on before.

I didn't see that (or don't remember at least), but I suppose it is
infrastructure related?

Hopefully that sort of thing will diminish after the move to the new
colo...

Ian.