From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: re-enable dynticks
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:08:39 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424045319.3018.2.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54DE52BC.3020303@us.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 13:38 -0600, Paul Clarke wrote:
> implement arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() for powerpc
>
> Commit 9b01f5bf3 introduced a dependency on "IRQ work self-IPIs" for
> full dynamic ticks to be enabled, by expecting architectures to
> implement a suitable arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() routine.
>
> Several arches have implemented this routine, including x86 (3010279f)
> and arm (09f6edd4), but powerpc was omitted.
>
> This patch implements this routine for powerpc.
>
> The symptom, at boot (on powerpc arch systems) with "nohz_full=<CPU
> list>" is displayed:
> NO_HZ: Can't run full dynticks because arch doesn't support irq
> work self-IPIs
>
> after this patch:
> NO_HZ: Full dynticks CPUs: <CPU list>.
>
> Tested against 3.19.
It makes the message change, but is that correct? ie. do we actually implement
"IRQ work self-IPIs"?
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..18365ec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +#ifndef _ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
> +#define _ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
> +
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> +
> +static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
> +{
> + return 1;
Should be "true";
> +}
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-13 19:38 [PATCH] powerpc: re-enable dynticks Paul Clarke
2015-02-13 20:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-16 0:08 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2015-02-16 4:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-02-16 4:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-02-22 22:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-02-22 22:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-02-22 22:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-02-22 22:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-02-20 17:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Clarke
2015-02-20 17:08 ` Paul Clarke
2015-02-20 17:13 ` Paul Clarke
2015-02-20 17:13 ` Paul Clarke
2015-02-21 5:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-21 5:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-27 13:27 ` Paul Clarke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-13 4:37 [PATCH] powerpc: Re-enable dynticks Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1424045319.3018.2.camel@ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=pc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.